Blog

From company news to science articles, explore our latest developments and professional insights.

What Goes Wrong When MVNOs Choose the Wrong Core Network Architecture

What Goes Wrong When MVNOs Choose the Wrong Core Network Architecture
Image Source: pexels

When MVNOs choose wrong in their core network design, they encounter problems immediately and in the long run. They end up spending a lot on infrastructure and securing weak deals with network operators. Onboarding new customers takes longer, and this poor choice leads to mismatched prices, leaving customers dissatisfied. The core network design impacts every customer experience. Users may face service interruptions, dropped calls, or slow data speeds, which contribute to their frustration. In the telecom industry, many customers switch providers, with churn rates soaring as high as 15–25% in competitive markets. Acquiring a new customer is significantly more expensive than retaining an existing one. When MVNOs choose wrong with their core network design, it accelerates customer attrition, especially when satisfaction is low.

  • Network or service problems make customers leave.

  • Bad coverage and slow data make it easier to lose customers.

  • Keeping a customer costs much less than getting a new one.

Key Takeaways

  • Picking the right core network design is very important for MVNOs. It helps them avoid spending too much money and keeps customers happy.

  • A thin core architecture costs less and is easier to handle than a full core architecture. This helps MVNOs save money.

  • Fast onboarding is needed for MVNOs to get and keep customers. If there are delays, MVNOs can lose money.

  • MVNOs should choose MVNE partners who have good experience and use modern systems. This makes sure everything works well.

  • Making the core network design ready for the future with cloud-native and modular architectures helps MVNOs change with the market.

Cost Risks for MVNOs

Infrastructure and Maintenance Costs

MVNOs can lose a lot of money if they pick the wrong core network design. Choosing between thin and full core architectures changes how much money MVNOs need. Thin core architecture costs less and is easier to take care of. Full core architecture costs more and needs more work. The table below shows the differences:

MVNO Type

CAPEX/OPEX Level

Complexity Level

Thin MVNO

Low

Low

Full MVNO

High

High

Thin core architecture helps MVNOs save money and keep things simple. Full core architecture makes MVNOs spend more on equipment, software, and skilled workers. MVNOs must decide how much to spend so they can still compete. If MVNOs choose wrong, they spend too much on equipment. This means they have less money for ads and helping customers. Prices for customers can go up, and people may not want to join.

Tip: MVNOs should think about what equipment they need before picking a core network design. Good planning saves money and helps keep the business strong.

Licensing and Vendor Lock-In

Licensing costs and vendor lock-in are big risks for MVNOs. A bad core network design can make MVNOs depend on one vendor for important systems. This can lead to higher fees and less freedom. MVNOs may not be able to get better deals or change vendors easily. The market likes MVNOs who keep their choices open and avoid long contracts.

Vendor lock-in also makes it hard to add new services. MVNOs with strict core architectures cannot add new features or meet customer needs easily. Licensing costs can go up fast, especially when MVNOs pay for every new thing. This uses up money and makes it hard to compete.

Note: MVNOs should look for core solutions that use open standards and flexible licenses. This helps avoid vendor lock-in and keeps costs steady.

Onboarding and Marketing Delays

Onboarding delays cost MVNOs money. If the core network design is not good, bringing new customers takes longer. This uses up money before MVNOs start making money. The table below shows what happens when onboarding is slow:

Evidence

Description

Financial Strain

Onboarding delays use up money before MVNOs make money.

ROI Impact

Longer onboarding times slow down profits for wholesale MNOs and make the business less appealing.

MVNOs need fast onboarding to do well. Slow onboarding makes marketing start later and delays making money. MVNOs must move quickly to get customers and grow in the market. Delays can mess up pricing plans because MVNOs rush to change prices. This can make them lose money and hurt their brand.

Evidence

Description

Operational Overhead

Fast onboarding lowers extra work and helps MVNOs stay strong.

Time-to-Revenue

Getting money faster helps MVNOs compete in telecom.

MVNOs who pick the wrong core network design fall behind others. They spend more on equipment, pay more for licenses, and lose time with slow onboarding. These risks make it hard to give customers good value and can hurt the MVNO’s future.

Scalability and Flexibility Issues

Scalability and Flexibility Issues
Image Source: unsplash

Growth Limitations for MVNOs

MVNOs have trouble growing if they pick the wrong core network design. The core is the base for every service and product. If the core is old or relies too much on the host network, MVNOs cannot grow fast. Growth slows because the core cannot handle more users or traffic. MVNOs find it hard to launch new products in the mvno market. The table below shows how old core network design causes problems with scaling:

Issue

Description

Bounded Autonomy and Innovation

MVNOs depend on the host MNO’s core, so they cannot create new things on their own.

No Differentiation

Standard core platforms stop MVNOs from making special services for different groups.

Slow Market Launch

Old infrastructure makes new product launches take months, so MVNOs cannot react quickly.

High Operational Costs

Old devices make MVNOs spend more on bandwidth and equipment because they cannot change settings easily.

Missed Monetization Opportunities

Weak core features mean MVNOs cannot use flexible prices or add services to earn more money.

Thin Architecture Constraints

Thin architecture puts strong limits on MVNOs. The core network design in thin models depends on the host network and MVNE. MVNOs cannot offer many products or services. The mvno market is tough because all MVNOs seem the same. Only price helps them stand out.

Thin architecture stops MVNOs from having many products. The host network and MVNE set strict rules. MVNOs cannot offer different services. It is hard for MVNOs to be unique except for their prices.

The biggest problem with thin MVNO architecture is that MVNOs can only offer what the MVNE and MNO allow. MVNOs cannot choose their own products or services.

Service Innovation Barriers

MVNOs cannot create new things if the core network design is too strict. The core decides how fast MVNOs can use new technology. MVNOs need the host network’s equipment. This makes it hard for MVNOs to set their own prices or make service better. MVNOs often get stuck with slow updates and bad deals. The core stops them from making new services for customers. MVNOs miss chances to grow and do better in the mvno market. The wrong core network design keeps them from helping customers and slows down their growth.

Compliance and Security Challenges

Compliance and Security Challenges
Image Source: unsplash

Data Privacy and Regulatory Risks

When mvnos pick the wrong core network design, they face big risks. The core handles private customer data and billing info. If the core does not follow the rules, mvnos can get in trouble with the law. These problems can hurt their name and even stop their business. Customers stop trusting mvnos if there are privacy issues. The core network design affects every part of the mvno business. If mvnos break rules, it can mess up their work and cause billing mistakes. These errors make it hard for mvnos to keep customers and stay open.

Increased Security Vulnerabilities

A weak core network design makes security problems worse. Hackers attack the core because it holds user data and services. Bad infrastructure makes fraud easier to happen. Security holes can cost mvnos a lot of money. The table below shows how fraud can hurt mvnos:

Type of Fraud

Financial Impact

Subscription Fraud

$500–$1,200 lost per fraudulent account

Payment Method Manipulation

Increased processing fees due to chargebacks

Promotion Abuse

$1.5M loss in a single quarter from promo abuse

Overall Revenue Leak

5% revenue leak can slash profit by 83%

Security problems in the core slow down growth. When mvnos fix security issues, they cannot grow or add new services. This makes it hard to compete and keep up with the market.

Failure to Meet Industry Standards

If mvnos do not follow industry standards, they lose access to key markets. The core must support rules for fair competition and smooth work. If mvnos miss these standards, they cannot offer new services or work with other networks. The table below explains how missing standards hurts mvnos:

Key Findings

Description

Mandated Access Regulation

Associated with lower investment intensity among MNOs, affecting competitiveness.

Voluntary Access Provision

No significant effect on MNO investment incentives.

Overall Impact

MVNOs can enhance competition, but may reduce MNOs’ investment incentives, potentially undermining market dynamics.

A bad core network design makes it hard for mvnos to grow and keep up with changes. They risk falling behind as technology and rules change. The core network design shapes the future of every mvno.

Operational Inefficiencies

Manual Processes and Delays

When mvnos pick the wrong core network design, they use manual steps. These steps slow down how things work. Old systems in the core make IT service management less efficient. Staff must fix problems and make changes by hand. This causes mistakes and makes things take longer. Without automation, every change takes more time. Errors happen more often. Teams work in silos, so it is hard for them to help each other. This lowers how well they work together.

  • Manual steps slow things down and interrupt services.

  • More delays make customers have a worse experience.

  • Customers get upset and may switch to another company.

Automation in the core helps solve these issues. Without it, mvno teams cannot keep up with what customers want. Service quality gets worse.

Slow Service Provisioning

A slow core network design makes it hard to set up new services. Customers want fast activation and easy onboarding. If the core does not have automation, every new service takes longer. This makes customers unhappy and they may not trust the mvno.

  • Most customers will leave after just one bad experience.

  • If an mvno offers a new bundle but billing is slow, customers get annoyed and may go to another provider.

“If your company does not give MVNOs the tools for fast fixes, they will leave.”

Automation in the core makes service faster and keeps customers happy. Without it, mvnos lose customers and money.

Customer Experience Impact

Bad core network design hurts customers at every step. High delays in the core mean slower data and worse service. If there is no backup, one problem can cause dropped calls and outages. MNOs may put their own users first, so mvno customers get lower call quality.

  • Slow speeds and high delays make customers unhappy.

  • Weak support and slow onboarding make more people leave.

  • Bad prices and poor service push customers away.

Evidence Description

Impact on Churn Rates

No real-time view of money and customer actions

Makes mistakes more likely, so more customers leave and revenue drops.

Weak support and slow onboarding

Customers leave if their needs are not met quickly and well.

MVNOs need automation and a strong core network design to make customers happy, work better, and grow. Without these, problems will keep hurting customer retention and business growth.

Strategic Choices for MVNO Success

MVNE Partner Selection

Picking the right MVNE partner is very important for mvnos. This choice decides how the core network design will work. A good MVNE partner helps mvnos avoid mistakes and grow. The best partner has lots of experience and strong technical skills. They also have a clear plan for starting the mvno. Some mvnos fail because they pick partners with old systems or bad communication. These mistakes make costs go up and slow down how fast things work.

The table below shows what to look for in an MVNE partner:

Criteria

Description

Strong Track Record

The MVNE should show a history of success in the mvno market.

Expertise in Network Management

The partner must manage the core and network with skill and knowledge.

Full Life-Cycle Support

The MVNE should help from the start of the mvno launch to daily operations.

Effective Communication

Open channels build trust and solve problems quickly.

Clear Service Level Agreements

SLAs set clear rules for performance and responsibility.

Focus on Continuous Improvement

The MVNE must adapt to changes and improve the core network design over time.

Some MVNEs use old systems that are hard to connect with. These old platforms make it harder and cost more to get started. When integration is slow, the mvno launch takes longer and does not work as well. Successful mvnos pick partners who use new systems and support automation. This makes things work better and gives subscribers a smoother experience.

Tip: MVNOs should ask about the MVNE’s technology, support, and history before picking a partner. Good planning helps mvnos work better for a long time.

Value-Added Services

Value-added services help mvnos stand out from others. These services are more than just calls and data. They make things better for subscribers and add value to the mvno business. MVNOs can give special plans, data bundles, and cool promotions. These choices fit what customers want and like.

  • Special plans and bundles bring in new subscribers and keep current ones happy.

  • Omnichannel support and self-service tools let customers control their accounts.

  • Trust and honesty make customers stay and not leave.

MVNOs who focus on value-added services grow faster and work better. Customers stay longer when they feel important and have a good experience. The right core network design helps these services with automation and flexibility. If mvnos do not have these features, they lose value and do not grow as much.

Note: MVNOs should listen to what customers say and use data to make new services. This helps mvnos do well and stay ahead in the mvno market.

Future-Proofing Core Network Design

Making the core network design ready for the future helps mvnos win over time. Technology changes quickly, so mvnos must keep up to compete. A modular core network design makes updates and new services easy. Cloud-native architectures give mvnos more flexibility and strong performance. These systems use the cloud to grow when needed and work better.

The table below lists the best ways to get ready for the future:

Best Practice

Description

Cloud-native architectures

Use cloud resources for better flexibility and performance.

Modular designs

Make updates and scaling easy to meet new needs.

Automation

Reduce manual work and speed up service delivery.

Security compliance

Regular audits and training protect customer data and meet rules.

Pay-as-you-grow model

Pay only for what is used, lowering upfront costs.

Agility

Adapt quickly to changes in technology and the market.

Virtualized network designs

Use NFV and SDN for better resource management and cost control.

Automation in the core helps mvnos launch new services fast and handle more users. Security compliance keeps customer data safe and builds trust. The pay-as-you-grow model lets mvnos grow without spending too much at first. Virtualized network designs help use resources better and save money. Planning for the future means picking a core that can change with the market.

MVNOs who use cloud-native architectures and modular core network design stay ahead. They give better value, help more subscribers, and succeed for a long time.

Picking the wrong core network design causes lots of trouble for an mvno. Customers stop trusting the company when their service gets worse. If there is not enough automation, services become slow and less helpful. Bad core network design teaches mvno teams to use more automation and modular core network design. They also need to focus on giving value. MVNOs that use automation make customers happier and give them more value. Good planning and choosing the right MVNE partner help mvnos do well. Customers want good value, quick automation, and better service. MVNOs do best when they learn from mistakes and plan for the future.

FAQ

Why does choosing the wrong core network design increase costs?

Bad core network design makes companies buy more equipment. They spend extra money on fixing and keeping things working. Companies pay more for licenses. Onboarding new customers takes longer. These problems make it hard to save money.

Why do MVNOs struggle with service innovation?

MVNOs have trouble when their core network depends on the host. They cannot make new products fast. Strict rules stop them from giving special services. Customers do not get new choices.

Why does a weak core network design cause customer churn?

Customers leave when data is slow or calls drop. Poor support makes people upset. Weak core network design causes service problems. People switch to other providers for better service.

Why is compliance important for MVNOs?

Rules help keep customer data safe. They make sure companies compete fairly. If a company ignores rules, it can get in trouble. Customers stop trusting the company. Meeting standards keeps the business safe.

Why should MVNOs choose a future-proof core network design?

Technology changes quickly. A future-proof design helps companies keep up. They can launch new services easily. Companies grow and meet market needs.